Bienvenue sur mon site Web

*******

I walk so I will remember what freedom looked like when they steal it and as I went for my customary stroll this evening I saw an astonishing sight. Standing on one corner, deep in conversation, were two men. Obviously this was a "testosterone fueled" discussion so I thought I had better give them a wide berth in case one or both of them produced a large automatic weapon and started killing everyone is sight. That's what "testosterone fueled" men do you know. Honest! A feminist told me so it must be true. I thought they just built things -- you know -- like civilisation, but apparently not.

On the other side of the street on another corner, a group of women were also standing together. They seemed very angry and were all stabbing an effigy of a male with a sign around his neck which read, "Real Man." I noticed that the effigy had two very large testicles and an average sized penis which one of the women was trying to cut off. However, no matter how much she hacked away she could not remove it. This seemed to infuriate the whole group and they began stabbing and screaming with ever greater fury. One of them had a T-Shirt on which bore the slogan, "Harriet's Angels." Beneath it was a patch that had the words; "We want equality so give us all the power now!" on it. This, was a feminist, oestrogen fueled, "discussion." I shuddered as I thought about the prospect of a whole cabinet made up of women like this and the nuclear button winking a red light invitingly, close by. Our entire stock of nuclear weaponry aimed at football stadiums around the country.

I left them to it and wandered onwards. It was not long before I came across a group of normal women. "Evening ladies." I said, as I approached them. "Hello love." One of them replied. We chatted about this and that for a while as we stood in the pleasant evening sunshine. As I bade them farewell one of them called after me.

"Have you seen Bob?"

I stopped and looked at her. "No. Not since yesterday. Why? Do you have to talk with him about something?"

She smiled. "No. I just wondered how he is. I haven't seen him for a week or so."

I returned her smile. "OK. If I see him I will tell him you asked after him. He was fine when I saw him yesterday."

"OK. George." She said, waving at me as I walked away.

Nice and normal. I made no attempt to oppress them and they did not hate me for being male. Not one of them mentioned a glass ceiling. Not one of them said I was part of the patriarchal conspiracy to keep them down. Consequently -- and you will not be surprised at this -- none of them had ever worked for the BBC or the Sun newspaper. Oddly, there was not a single lesbian among them either. All of these women (I have known them for years) either have kids now, or have had kids that have grown up and left home. Not one of them bore the marks where the mythical slave anklet had scarred their skin from being chained to the kitchen sink and all but one of the five was still married and a housewife. I was astounded at their normality.

OK. Concerning the women stabbing the effigy. I was exaggerating a little there. In fact, a lot. They were not really there but, women like this do exist and many of them are in the House of Commons and the BBC. A case for reform of both institutions if ever I saw one. The point is though, that these creatures really do think like this. They really do. Not all of them are women either. I just needed a contrast between the insane feminists and the normal women I know and love. Please excuse my poetic license.

Oh. In case you think I jest too much. Here is an actual quote from a feminist or three concerning men:

            "It cannot therefore be assumed that men are bound to be an asset to family life or that the presence of fathers in families is necessarily a means to social harmony or cohesion."
            Anna Coote, Harriet Harman, & Patricia Hewitt. The Family Way

And just to show I am not biased, here is one from a patriarchal male of no consequence:

            "The women's suffrage movement is only the small edge of the wedge, if we allow women to vote it will mean the loss of social structure and the rise of every liberal cause under the sun.            Women are well represented by their fathers, brothers, and husbands."
            Winston Churchill

Tsk! Men huh? Just shows how wrong he was!

Finally, here is one from a nice cuddly Russian who murdered a few million Estonian people by starving them to death and from whom, feminists get their ideas:

            "Destroy the family and you destroy society "
            Lenin

On the way home I called in to see a colleague and friend of mine. Also female. Married with two children and happy. I opened the back door and wandered into the kitchen. She was not there but I could hear her moving about upstairs so I called out.

"Hello oppressed one? It's only me. Your friendly neighbourhood oppressor and potential rapist."

"Make yourself a cuppa." She called and then added. "Make me one too, will you?"

I checked myself. Nope! Not a single urge to beat her to death for daring to ask ME, a superior man, to make HER, a mere woman, a cup of tea. Another feminist male stereotype bit the dust. As I poured the hot water into the cups she called down again.

"I have got something for you."

A joke was called for. I could not resist. "Does it come in see through nylon?" I yelled back.

Another voice called out. Male this time. "If it does. I want to see it first. It's been hiding for a week." It was Trev. Her husband.

Just then there was a loud thump.

"Did she just hit you?" I yelled. I heard his wife laugh.

"No. It's OK." Trev shouted. "I just dropped a roll of carpet"

"Want a cuppa, Trev?" I called.

"Nah. Got one thanks." He replied.

Just a normal, everyday banter filled conversation between long time friends. Both of which vote.

In the world of the loony PC infected morons that escaped from the nuthouse years ago and joined the Labour Party, the Sun's editorial staff, the BBC, turned to feminism or became David Cameron's nanny, this conversation should have been banned years ago. The thought police hate stuff like this; but then, they would, this is normal life and they are nutters.

As I waited for them to come down, I sat on the back door step enjoying the evening sounds around me and smoking a cigarette. Another taboo, beloved of Marxists and Fascists (This conglomeration is known as, "The Third Way.") in the health service and government. As I dragged on my fag, I pondered that if global warming is real -- and not just a way for business to get richer and government to impose carbon taxes on us once we have all been made to feel guilty enough -- I might grow my own tobacco in the garden.

As I thought of this, I had a vision of armed police smashing in the front door (they don't learn about doorbells in police training camps) and bursting through the house and into the garden. There they forced me to lie down and practiced their, "resisting arrest restraint techniques" on me for five minutes or so and then, when I had regained consciousness, they told me my rights -- none -- and explained in the kindly way the British Bobby is famous for all over the tourist postcards, that I was, "F****** nicked under E.U. directive 1,245000,368.3 section 4h subsection 83m/b for being in possession, with intent to enjoy, a banned substance. Namely, tobacco." I was then warned that anything I did not say would be made up and used in evidence against me and hauled before an unbiased Magistrate. Once there, I was sentenced to death by shooting for daring to place the National Health budget at risk, before I had time to say, "not guilty your PC-ness," to the judge.

The two reprobates I call friends arrived and as his wife drank her tea and chatted to me, Trev went off to find the DVD he wanted me to look at. After a while his shout of, "found it!" was the cue for us to file into the living room to watch it. Like a good subservient female dominated by the men around her and cowed by that domination, Trev's misses led the way and I trotted on behind.

In the living room I watched the DVD and then Trev got on his computer, copied off the segments I wanted and handed me the results. I thanked him. We all smoked a fag and then I left. All the way home I mercilessly beat myself with an invisible club for not washing the cups up, doing the housework and digging the garden before I left the poor helpless female in the company of her repressive patriarchal monster of a husband.

At home I watched the segment and uploaded it to a file sharing site so others around the world could see it and store it. Another bit added to the pile of evidence to be used later.

So ends another day in my humdrum life of trying to educate people about feminism, with some success, I might add. Of course I have my failures. Lots of journalists and BBC staff are too brainwashed to think for themselves and most of the political world is even worse -- but not all of them. A few know what I am saying is right and some of those have got testicles big enough to fight back. Among the women I know there is a great new awareness growing up about just how conned they have been by feminists. One lady -- I shall call her Pat -- actually spat on the floor when I mentioned feminism to her and she said, "We should give them their own island and a lifetime supply of dildo's and leave them to it." She takes great exception to having her sons and daughter described in terms like this:

            "Heterosexuality is a die-hard custom through which male-supremacist institutions insure their own perpetuity and control over us.

Women are kept, maintained and contained through terror, violence, and the spray of semen...

            [Lesbianism is] an ideological, political and philosophical means of liberation of all women from heterosexual tyranny..."
            Cheryl Clarke, "Lesbianism, An Act of Resistance," in This Bridge Called My Back: Writing by Radical Women of Color, ed. Cherrie Moraga (Women of Color Press,1983), pp.128-137.

Before I go, I want just to say that quite a few feminists got their knickers all bunched up because I said recently that business had conspired with feminists to drive women out of their homes in the late 50's and early 60's and beyond, by selling them the lie that if they went to work they would be free. To do this of course, it was necessary to back up the feminist idea that men treated women badly as a matter of routine and so they started to wind up women by making highly offensive adverts and putting them out on radio and TV. Giving the impression that all men thought as they were portrayed in the Ads. The amount of hate mail I got from the "sisters" was quite staggering, even for me. I love it when that happens. It means I have struck a nerve they would rather I did not talk about. Now, where did the idea come from that women were better off abandoning their families and young children and going off to slave away in factories and shops alongside the men, thus undermining one of the principle foundations of western civilisation, the family unit?

Here is a clue. He was a Marxist.

No?

OK. Here you go....

            "The first condition of the liberation of the wife is to bring the whole female sex back into public industry, and this in turn demands the abolition of the monogamous family as the economic          unit of society."
            Frederick Engels, The Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State (1942) p.67

Has the penny dropped yet? Through business greed and Marxist infiltration, our society with its freedoms, its beloved institutions, its security and its history is slowly being taken over by Communism. Step by step. One of those steps is the stealing of children to be brought up by the State (Also known as "Village" politics) and that means removing their fathers.

            "The care of children ..is infinitely better left to the best trained practitioners of both sexes who have chosen it as a vocation...[This] would further undermine family structure while           contributing to the freedom of women."
            Kate Millet, Sexual Politics 178-179

Remember this?

            "It cannot therefore be assumed that men are bound to be an asset to family life or that the presence of fathers in families is necessarily a means to social harmony or cohesion"
            Anna Coote, Harriet Harman, & Patricia Hewitt. The Family Way

Welcome to the revolution you did not see coming because it has taken 50 years to get here. Step by stealthy step. Coincidently, political correctness has its origins in something called the Frankfurt School. Look them up on the Internet. Guess who they were.
Yep!
Marxists.
Guess what the aim of PC is.
Yep!
The destabilising of western society.

So! Next time you hear about children being forcibly taken away from perfectly good parents because they are "too stupid." Or, kids stabbing each other. Or, Muslims being let into the country in droves and then rampaging on the streets calling for the deaths of people they do not like. Or family courts removing all contact with children from their fathers. Just think about why it is all happening and then picture Harriet Harman as prime minister.

Getting it now?

I will leave you with this quote. As you read it, think about how the meaning of once innocent words are being changed in PC Britain. If you want your country back, YOU have to take it back and you cannot trust any politician currently in government or opposition to give it back. That means you have to vote them out or force them out by the courts and the use of common law and you have to take their place. What you are watching is treason taking place and YOU are the target of it. They are taking you for a fool and stealing your freedom, your families and your children while they do it.

            "All propaganda must be popular and its intellectual level must be adjusted to the most limited intelligence among those it is addressed to. Consequently, the greater the mass it is intended     to reach, the lower its purely intellectual level will have to be. But if, as in propaganda for sticking out a war, the aim is to influence a whole people, we must avoid excessive intellectual demands on our public, and too much caution cannot be extended in this direction. ...

The receptivity of the great masses is very limited, their intelligence is small, but their power of forgetting is enormous. In consequence of these facts, all effective propaganda must be limited to a very few points and must harp on these in slogans until the last member of the public understands what you want him to understand by your slogan....

The function of propaganda is, for example, not to weigh and ponder the rights of different people, but exclusively to emphasize the one right which it has set out to argue for. Its task is not to make an objective study of the truth, in so far as it favors the enemy, and then set it before the masses with academic fairness; its task is to serve our own right, always and unflinchingly."
Adolph Hitler, Mein Kampf, Chapter VI

And you thought feminism was a noble thing dedicated to giving women "equality" didn't you?

Study it and wake up! Think for yourself. They HATE that!

George Rolph
London
June 14th 09

George Rolph

Dieudonné: après les sionistes, les féministes...

Est-ce qu'on est une mère quand on a tué son enfant

Huit ans de prison pour la mère infanticide à saint-Brieuc

Cancer du sein: dépôt d'une demande de recours collectif