Injustice For All: The International Criminal Court

Closely related to “The United Nations: A Look Into The Future” is a second video of crucial importance entitled “Injustice for All”, about the UN’s International Criminal Court (ICC). In the works for many years as another UN tentacle, the court is now being aggressively pushed for worldwide acceptance, including Senate approval in the United States. This riveting video gives us all the reasons why Senate ratification of this diabolical scheme must never happen.
Holding our attention with every word is a carefully chosen panel of speakers including William Norman Grigg and William F. Jasper, Dr. Charles Rice of the University of Notre Dame Law School, Attorney Nikola Kostich of Milwaukee, and Dr. Srdja Trifkovic of the Lord Byron Foundation.
From the differing areas of expertise of these fine speakers we learn the frightening facts of what the ICC would mean to each and every one of us. Posing as a defender of human rights with its gilded image of condemning “crimes against humanity,” the ICC is in reality a monstrosity bent on destroying all human rights. As Dr. Rice comments, the ICC means the total repeal of our constitutional order and Bill of Rights. It has no legitimate basis for its claimed authority and no accountability. It is its own prosecutor, jury, and appeals body.
Such a UN tribunal would have no procedural protections against abuse. There would be no trial by jury, no right for a defendant to present witnesses in self-defense, and no right to meet with an attorney. Self-incrimination would be demanded, and there could be two or three years incarceration before being brought before a court, which would be only a formality as the defendant will already have been judged guilty. Cases would be decided by judges from notorious despotisms such as Cuba, China, Pakistan, or Nigeria, from African countries with tribal laws, or from Muslim countries with laws based on premises quite different from our own. In short, the ICC would fasten an alien body of jurisprudence over the American constitutional system.
Although the video opens with a fictional example of an American being virtually kidnaped under a sealed indictment and hauled off to Holland to face an ICC court for a “crime against the international community” (upholding our constitutionally guaranteed rights in a speech), William Jasper tells us that this “fiction” is already reality. We currently have this model in the UN war crimes tribunals at The Hague, where methods and standards unacceptable to any civilized country are practiced. All the travesties associated with the Yugoslavian war crimes trials, says Jasper, will be replicated in the ICC.

 

"Those with little money said they would have nothing to offer a partner, with some suffering self-esteem issues and withdrawing from the dating pool," said Weisman, an engineer-turned-author with two books now published.

 

Mode Clitoridienne

 

C'est pas moi qui le dit

"Love is the delusion that one woman differs from another."

HL Mencken

 

1970 - Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era by Zbigniew Brzezinski is published.  He is a CFR member who will become the first director of the Trilateral Commission and President Carter's national security advisor.  In this book he states:  'Marxism represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man's universal vision.  Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief.....Human beings become increasingly manipulable and malleable...Today we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational elites....whose ties cut across national boundaries....The nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty....Further progress will require greater American sacrifices.   More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be underta

 

Toutes ces belles reproductrices font plaisir à voir.

Ben quoi?

 

Why So High?

 

Top Iranian’s Explanation for High Oil Prices

 

Bilderberger Confab in United States Goes Unreported … Again

 

Ron Paul Ends His Campaign for President, Starts a New Venture

 

Gender Plays Role in Kidney Transplant Outcomes

 

The call that officers dread

 

A GLOSSARY OF NEWSPEAK

 

A LA RECHERCHE D'UN BON AVOCAT

 

L'Huître et les Plaideurs

Un jour deux Pèlerins sur le sable rencontrent
Une Huître que le flot y venait d'apporter :
Ils l'avalent des yeux, du doigt ils se la montrent ;
A l'égard de la dent il fallut contester.
L'un se baissait déjà pour amasser la proie ;
L'autre le pousse, et dit : Il est bon de savoir
Qui de nous en aura la joie.
Celui qui le premier a pu l'apercevoir
En sera le gobeur ; l'autre le verra faire.
- Si par là on juge l'affaire,
Reprit son compagnon, j'ai l'œil bon, Dieu merci.
- Je ne l'ai pas mauvais aussi,
Dit l'autre, et je l'ai vue avant vous, sur ma vie.
- Eh bien ! vous l'avez vue, et moi je l'ai sentie.
Pendant tout ce bel incident,
Perrin Dandin arrive : ils le prennent pour juge.
Perrin fort gravement ouvre l'Huître, et la gruge,
Nos deux Messieurs le regardant.
Ce repas fait, il dit d'un ton de Président :
Tenez, la cour vous donne à chacun une écaille
Sans dépens, et qu'en paix chacun chez soi s'en aille.
Mettez ce qu'il en coûte à plaider aujourd'hui ;
Comptez ce qu'il en reste à beaucoup de familles ;
Vous verrez que Perrin tire l'argent à lui,
Et ne laisse aux plaideurs que le sac et les quilles.

Jean de la Fontaine

 

Al Jazeera journalist on trial