In 1966, a Georgetown University professor published a big book about the elite Network which he said controls America. His book approved of their plan for global, or world, control to supersede our self-government by “We the people.” The professor had a profound effect on one of his students.
In 1992, that student became President of the United States and Bill Clinton credited Professor Carroll Quigley with forming his vision for the future. In the next several years, he pushed for several United Nations treaties (including some rejected by Presidents Reagan and Bush) which are designed to control human behavior, energy consumption, private property, and natural resources. The President issued a secret order (PDD 25) to place American armed forces under foreign command and in foreign uniform, and he began using U.S. troops as global cops and social workers. His Administration is steadily putting American trade and property under the control of international organizations.
|
|
La Gazette des gonzes
Content d'être un gars
|
|
Séparons Féminisme et État
Mercredi, le 2
juillet 2008 |
|
.jpg)
Ingrid Bétancourt négocie les droits avec un producteur d'Hollywood
Global Governance: The Quiet War Against American Independence
Ça fait plaisir à voir cette belle jeunesse pétante de santé
It's so important to these men to get it right. My best advice to single women after bachelors is to be patient. If you're in a hurry to get married you'll be frustrated.
C'est pas moi qui le dit
"A woman is an occasional pleasure but a cigar is always a smoke."
Groucho Marx
1968 - October: In this edition of the CFR's Foreign Affairs is an article, 'Asia After Vietnam,' by Richard Nixon (CFR member 1961-1965), in which he writes of nations' disposition 'to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order.'
Les nouvelles salopes" ou "la culture cul"
C'est quelque jours seulement avant la publication du rapport du Vérificateur général du Québec. On conclura la rencontre en se tenant par la main et en chantant "Ce n'est une au revoir mes soeurs." Il faut toujours qu'elles féminisent les chanson. Le journal Joboom devrait déléguer un journaliste.
Just Say No To Idiots
(A view from the streets)By George Rolph
3rd July 2008Don't hate the feminists, pity them. They are locked into an ideological nightmare that even they cannot understand. It is a form of lunacy. Understand that they need treatment to help them recover. Just don't make the mistake of taking them seriously and swallowing their lies.
There are people in society that no one should take seriously, such as, Nazi's, Kelvin Mackenzie, the BNP, Cherie Blair, Amy Winehouse, Vanessa Phelps and most of the domestic media. These and many others, live in a cocoon of self imposed illusion. In their world, they are important kings and queens. In our world, they are mostly mental. In their world, what they say is vitally important, in our world, what they say is often so far from the truth it may as well be the devil speaking. (Come to think of it, it probably is!)
Feminists inhabit a different world in which all men are out to get them and to prove it, they go on, and on, and on, and on, about the bad things SOME men do. They are like paranoid Bee keepers who think that all the Bees want to hurt them for personal reasons. They get stung once and assume the whole hive is after them. To them, all Bees are evil. They cannot see the Bees that make the honey. Only the Bees that sting the Bee keepers.
While, at the same time as bleating that they want absolute equality with men, they get suddenly coy when asked to take the same degree of responsibility men take. Thus, they will talk about male violence and crime until our brains turn to jelly under the onslaught, but refuse to discuss female violence and crime because that means facing the reality that it is not just the patriarchy that is naughty, but the matriarchy has a dubious record also. Child killing is a subject that feminists avoid like the Black Death, for example. Unless it is to invent excuses for it. This is why the BBC will talk about child killers of a female kind, ONLY in terms of miscarriages of justice. Facing the truth is too hard for the average BBC fem.'
The politician hates the idea of facing up to female violence, it seems, because of the economic consequences of having to deal with female criminals. Better to ignore it, make other excuses for it and hope it goes away!
Another thing to avoid is being sucked into the shame game that they play. I am not ashamed to be a man because some men are evil. I refuse to allow myself to be beaten up mentally and emotionally because some sick man went on a rape rampage or beat his wife. I know that the men who do this need help. There is something not vibrating in tune in their minds. It may well be that the trigger for their actions was some misdeed done to them by a woman when they were children. To find out, I have to ask them and then try and help them through it. The Jeremy Kyle/Feminist approach is to just condemn them, beat then up and then ask them. I want to help them, not hate all men because of them.
No! I am proud to be a man and that drives the fem's nuts. They want me to hate myself. I refuse.
Another illusion is to think that because a female is loud mouthed, aggressive and talks fast, that she knows what she is talking about. She thinks she is being, "assertive." In reality, she is just another bitch. Ignore those who are like that. Laugh at them but do not take them seriously.
Respect has to be a two way street. If they show you no respect, show them the same contempt. There are many smart women who are not feminists, not bitches and who *do *know the truth about their own gender. These are the women who are worth talking too and worthy of showing respect.
In a similar way, let's contrast two different gay men.
That cretin that spat in the man's face in the Big Brother house needs a spell in jail or hospital. He is a nutter. Of course, every politically correct idiot in the nation will tell us that we HAVE to respect him because he is gay. NO WE DON'T! It makes no difference if he is gay or straight. ANY idiot that spits in another mans face deserves no respect at all. The fact that this idiot did it while screaming that his victim was "homophobic" speaks volumes in itself. To him, the word 'homophobic' is a weapon to beat straight men with. He is stuck in perpetual victim mode. (A lot like feminists). I refuse to let fools like him beat me with anything! You shouldn't either.
Now, by contrast, consider Peter Tatchell. When he first came to public prominence it was chiefly as a gay man outing other gays. I loathed what he was doing. He was acting like a bully for his own ends and was creating misery and fear in others in order to make his dubious political points. (A lot like feminists really). Then he stopped doing that and became a man of great courage and principle. His rating, with me personally, went through the roof. I began to admire him.
Two different gay men a million miles apart. One deserving of nothing but contempt, the other deserving of respect. The politically correct say, we must respect them both. I say, you are talking from the wrong orifice and nothing you can say will force me to respect that idiot from the Big Brother house and he can call me 'homophobic' until the pink cows come home. It will still not be true.
The point is, that if black people, brown people, white people, women, young or old, other men, gays, the media, lesbians or feminists want our respect as a people, let them earn it. Laws /ordering/ us to respect them are not going to work. Some we CAN respect. Others we cannot. That is reality.
Hey Labour! You remember reality don't you? It's what you had BEFORE you started listening to the feminists and began disrespecting everyone who is not a bra burning, men hating weirdo!
Do we have to respect someone before we will help them? Hell no! If we see someone in trouble (even a feminist) and it is possible to help them, we should. That is what makes us decent people. That is why I still bother to talk to feminists. I have hope that I can deprogram them.
If decent people see a burglar fall from an upstairs window and land on his or her back on the concrete, they should always put aside their feelings about the rights and wrongs of his or her ("his or her" because crime is an equal opportunities employer) actions and offer help until the ambulance comes. The moronic Sun 'Newspaper' approach might be that we should call all our mates and jump up and down on the unfortunate until we are /certain/ he or she is crippled and THEN call an ambulance, but that is the council of fools. Decent people do decent things. Idiots scream, make a fuss, claim their "rights" while abusing the rights of others and try to bully us all into becoming as sick as they are. Just listen to the 'we hate religion' brigade!
How then would I sum up this rant? Well, it's simple really.
Just say no to idiots. And that includes feminists. You listened to that lot and it has led to streets full of dead children with knives sticking out of them and family meltdown. Don't hate them. Just don't respect or listen to them either.
They don't deserve our respect and their lies hurt our ears and our children.
George Rolph. (UK)
July 3rd 2008.
Sexualité humaine: La pastèque érectile
Des chercheurs américains soutiennent que le melon d'eau produit les mêmes effets dilatatoires sur les vaisseaux sanguins que le Viagra. Il améliorerait même la libido.
The call that officers dread
"L'homme enceint" a accouché d'une fille
C'est pas une question c'est une affirmation décorée d'un point d'interrogation
Le mensonge féministe existe parce qu'il est très largement financé ?
Pauvre fille... la mère je veux dire. Pas celle qui a accouché. Elle c'est le père, l'autre. Pauvre fille! Elle va devoir payer une penion alimentaire.
Le transgenre donne naissance à une fille
Dans une mairie de Californie
Au suivant !
« Bonjour. Nous voulons faire une demande de contrat de mariage. »
« Les noms? »
« Tim et Jim Jones. »
« Jones? Êtes-vous liés? Je vois une ressemblance. »
« Oui, nous sommes frères. »
« Frères? On ne peut pas vous marier. »
« Pourquoi pas? N'avez-vous pas donné autorisation de mariage aux couples de même sexe? »
« Oui, des milliers de personnes. Mais nous n'avons jamais eu de frères et sœurs. C'est l'inceste! »
« L'inceste? Non, nous ne sommes pas gay. »
« Pas gay, alors pourquoi voulez-vous vous marier? »
« Pour les avantages financiers, évidemment. Et nous aimer les uns les autres. C'est tout. Nous n'avons pas d'autres projets. »
« Mais nous sommes constitués pour délivrer de contrats de mariage aux couples homosexuels à qui nous avons refusé la protection légitime en vertu de la loi. Si vous n'êtes pas gay, vous pouvez vous marier avec une femme. »
« Un instant. Un homme gay a le même droit que moi de marier une femme. Mais simplement parce que je suis hétérosexuel ne signifie pas nécessairement que je veuille épouser une femme. Je veux marier Jim. »
« Et je veux épouser Tim, allez-vous nous discriminer seulement parce que nous ne sommes pas gay? »
« OK, OK . Je vais vous accorder votre permis. Suivant. »
« Salut. Nous sommes ici pour se marier.»
« Les noms? »
« John Smith, Jane James, Robert Green, Juin et Johnson. »
« Qui veut se marier avec qui? »
« Nous voulons tous nous marier les uns avec les autres. »
« Mais vous êtes quatre personnes! »
« C'est exact. Vous le voyez, nous sommes tous bisexuels. J'aime Jane et Robert, Jane m'aime et Juin, Juin aime Robert et Jane, et Robert aime Juin et moi-même. Chacun d'entre nous désire se marier ensemble parce que c’est la seule façon que nous pouvons exprimer nos préférences sexuelles dans une relation conjugale. »
« Mais nous avons accordé seulement l'octroi de permis à l’égard des couples homosexuels. »
« Donc, vous faites de la discrimination à l'égard des couples bisexuels!»
« Non, c'est juste que, bien, l'idée traditionnelle du mariage est qu'il est réservé aux couples. »
« Depuis quand êtes-vous en faveur de la tradition? »
« Eh bien, je veux dire, il faut bien tracer une ligne quelque part. »
« Pour quelle raison? Il n'y a pas de raison logique de limiter le mariage aux couples. Plus nous sommes nombreux, le mieux nous sommes. En outre, nous exigeons nos droits! Le maire affirme que la Constitution garantit l'égalité de protection en vertu de la loi. Délivrez-nous un permis de mariage! »
« D’accord, d’accord. Au suivant. »
« Bonjour, j'aimerais un permis de mariage. »
« À quels noms? »
« David Deets. »
« Et l'autre homme? »
« C'est tout. Je veux me marier. »
« Vous marier? Que voulez-vous dire? »
« Eh bien, le psychiatre me raconte que j'ai une double personnalité. Je souhaite donc marier les deux ensembles. Peut-être que je pourrais déposer une déclaration commune de revenu? »
« C'est suffit! J'arrête!! Vous tournez en dérision l’institution du mariage! »
On va tout vous expliquer ça.
Vous allez voir ça va pas être court.En septembre 2007, à la veille du scrutin, une controverse éclate: un journaliste du quotidien The Gazette révèle que Pauline Marois et son conjoint, Claude Blanchet, possèdent une résidence située sur des terres anciennement agricoles (jusqu'à leur dézonage, en 1991), et sur des terrains publics expropriés en 1978 et destinés à la prolongation de l'autoroute 440
Une tuile pour la chef du PQ
|
Séparés à la naissance |
|
|
|
|
Le retour de Claude Blanchet
Claude Blanchet en entrevue au Devoir - La SGF veut «turbocharger»les économies régionales
Claude Blanchet quitte la SGF en empochant plus de
1 250 000$
L’affaire Marois
La SGF confirme le départ de Claude Blanchet
Pas très chrétien comme attitude
