|
|
Content d'être un gars
|
|
Mardi, le 25 mars 2008
|
|
La notion de devoir, du point de vue historique s'entend, fut un moyen qu'ont employé les puissants pour amener les autres à consacrer leur vie aux intérêts de leurs maîtres plutôt qu'aux leurs.
C'est vrai que ça commence à bien faire
.jpg)
Damnation of Her Ladyship: Heather's reputation shredded by 58-page judgment she tried to ban
The secrets she didn't want you to know: How the judge tore Heather's claims to shreds
"I suggest to you this perspective could stand in the case of Fathers and men across the world in terms of the application of law in the courts".
A Contrast: Canadian Justice for Canadian Fathers and Men set against the example of the despicable Heather Mills
Heather's Mills-her reputation shredded by judgment
The Daily Mail Article (below) covering the recent Heather Mills-Paul McCartney debacle should be interesting to us all as we look at the administration of British Justice over the obvious and now proven perjury of Heather Mills. it is especially interesting in my view because I have to ask how much better justice would be served in Canada for countless Men and fathers in Divorce or so called "Family" Court if we were to be find justice served equally honestly and fairly. One only has to look at what is provided for in terms of perjury under the Criminal Code of Canada to wonder how much more balanced justice would have been in our own personal cases if perjury was identified and charges made pending in view of "evidence" presented against so many of us in the event of judgements made as a result of such perjury. If Canadian family court adversaries were to be prosecuted relentlessly for perjury and proven fraud there would be a lot more real justice and a lot less perjury and fraud in my view. Look at the examples in the Heather Mills-Paul McCartney case in the UK. How many Fathers and Men reading this can see similarities to the 'justice by perjury' so many of us have suffered. How many of our so-called ex's would have proceeded down that road knowing that jail time in excess of 10 years could be the result? I doubt very many. Remember also that in Canada one doesn't even have to be in court to be found guilty of committing perjury. But why does it go on like it does without intervention and legal application? We all know (the legalists among us know especially full well) that perjury in family court and the often inevitable parallel criminal court where false allegations are dealt with) is rampant , unchecked and unpunished. In fact it often seems to be rewarded. Some of our brothers have suffered terribly as a result of perjury. Some are even in jail and have had their entire careers and lives destroyed by it. They almost certainly have lost their children, their careers and their property-everything they have ever built owned and loved. I do not know many Fathers and men who have not suffered directly as a result of perjury and mischief in one way or another. How many reading this could say with absolute certainty that their ex's would be in prison today if perjury was punishable the way its supposed to be punished? And imagine the outcome for us in terms of custody and equal or sole custody? I suggest to you this perspective could stand in the case of Fathers and men across the world in terms of the application of law in the courts.
JS
How Perjury is supposed to be dealt with in Canada under the Criminal Code:
PART IV: OFFENCES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION OF LAW AND JUSTICEMisleading Justice
Perjury 131. (1) Subject to subsection (3), every one commits perjury who, with intent to mislead, makes before a person who is authorized by law to permit it to be made before him a false statement under oath or solemn affirmation, by affidavit, solemn declaration or deposition or orally, knowing that the statement is false
(1.1) Subject to subsection (3), every person who gives evidence under subsection 46(2) of the Canada Evidence Act, or gives evidence or a statement pursuant to an order made under section 22.2 of the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act, commits perjury who, with intent to mislead, makes a false statement knowing that it is false, whether or not the false statement was made under oath or solemn affirmation in accordance with subsection (1), so long as the false statement was made in accordance with any formalities required by the law of the place outside Canada in which the person is virtually present or heard
2) Subsection (1) applies, whether or not a statement referred to in that subsection is made in a judicial proceeding
Punishment: 132. Every one who commits perjury is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 132; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 17; 1998, c. 35, s. 119
It seems to me that even with all the indications of perjury Mills should be prosecuted for Perjury. So should everyone. And in Canada-under existing law- this should certainly be so. it is in my opinion our duty to make that an automatic option. Our collective silence on this is acceptance of the legal status quo.. See the poll the British have taken on the matter:
Man hangs himself after being falsely accused of raping women and children
So what can this be classified as now? False accusations causing death? Well that much is pretty clear but who will be held responsible? What will the police do? What were the final agonies did Mr Adams have to endure and what did it seem like to him in his final moments as he did what he did. What did he think his entire previous life have been worth? That one letter from an unknown person was in effect a sentence of death
So if it happened in your country how would it be dealt with? I am almost certain that in my country Canada it wouldn't even be reported, never mind dealt with. In Canada Mr Adams would in all probability have been regarded as just another angry, drunk and crazy man who killed himself for some unspecified reason (probably because he must have done something wrong-probably was guilty of the charges-perhaps he might even just be regarded as a so-called "dead beat Dad") and would simply become just another non-defined suicide statistic.
Not a day goes by when I don't ask myself how many broken falsely charged but innocent Dads and men in Canada and elsewhere have killed themselves as a result of false allegations or simply as a result of outrageously unjust family and criminal law law decisions. Indeed how can a man live with the position he has been placed in? Some men particularly Dads never recover from false allegations of sexual abuse of their own children and the female accusers are almost never investigated or charged.
Society summarily judges men like Ian Adams all the time and he probably had absolutely no recourse in law and no way to defend his shattered reputation. He is sadly one of far too many. .
I know men like Ian Adams. Such is the level of my outrage I can barely speak of their cases when I am asked.
JS
Texas: un garçonnet meurt accidentellement écrasé sous femme obèse
Lose weight or we'll take all six of your children away: Outrage over social workers' 'draconian' ultimatum to parents
Faire l'amour en 2050
Le degré zéro de l'information
1982 - “Just as there must come a new world economic order, there must come a new world communication order…..It will take time, but it must come.” Christian Century April 14, 1982 p. 442, by William F. Fore.