- C'est grâce à moi si mon mari est devenu millionnaire!
- Ah bon... Et avant, qu'est-ce qu'il était?
- Il était Milliardaire!

 

 

Vaginocrates au pouvoir

À qui la ministre de la condition féminine est-elle inféodée?

En février 2004 Michèle Courchesne, alors ministre de la Condition féminine, annonçait la tenue prochaine d'une commission parlementaire sur l'égalité entre les femmes et les hommes. Elle déclare que les points de vue masculins ne sont pas recevables parce qu'ils ne sont le fait que de masculinistes.

Visionnez l'extrait

 

 En février 2008 Christine Saint-Pierre, alors ministre de la Condition féminine, commente la commission parlementaire sur l'amendement de la Charte des droits. Elle déclare que les points de vue masculins ne sont pas recevables parce qu'ils ne sont le fait que de masculinistes.

Écoutez l'extrait

 

Deux ministres différentes utilisent le même sophisme à quatre ans d'écart. Dans les deux cas le but de l'opération est d'établir que les hommes n'ont pas les droits qui sont reconnus aux femmes. Est-ce que c'est la ministre qui parle ou est-ce qu'elle n'est qu'une marionnette contrôlée par le personnel du ministère?

 

Bill would criminalize false abuse charges

 

"Bill would Criminalize false abuse charges" So there we go. This is the way it should be. The USA leads the way. Now we need this in Canada really badly. Why can't we have that here? Just one Province undertaking to use the already existing laws covering mischief would make an enormous difference. False charges and false accusations causing an investigation to be made by a police officer on any innocent person-man or woman-is an indictable offence under the criminal code and can see a false accuser sentenced to up to 2 years in jail. A few more false accusers in jail and this scourge would go away pretty quickly. And it should also be so that any lawyer, court official, organization  or individual counselling anyone to make a false allegation should similarly be subject to the full effect and sanction of the law and investigation from law societies and others in response.

JS

 

Biology is not destiny

 

Witness: Ontario Women in Shelters told to provide sex to the shelter workers or get out of the shelter.

http://www.vimeo.com/790290

Another video in the women’s shelter series in which a mother from Ontario, Canada describes her horrifying experience residing in women’s shelters in Ontario. In the shelters where she and others were residents, women were beaten, robbed, intimidated and sexually exploited. Children were exposed to violence, swearing and abuse by the women and often witnessed their mothers being abused and humiliated by shelter staff. Children are being taught that being “Canadian” and respecting yourself means to hate fathers, lie to your own parents and to call the Children’s Aid Society on your mother if you don’t get your way. When is the government of Ontario going to put an end to women’s shelters being used as indoctrination centers where lesbian women prey on vulnerable women? When is the Ontario government going to make these women’s shelters accountable and professional? When is all this government funded madness going to end?

This is yet another video in the series from Canada Court Watch and is based on an interview with another former resident of an Ontario women's shelter.  In this particular interview, the mother speaks about how she and other residents in the women's shelter were psychologically and sexually abused by the woman's shelter workers and children witnessed violence and abuse.   The message  given to this woman, among others was 'give sex to the workers or get out'. In case you missed the last video expose on the women's shelter series from March 2nd the link is here: http://www.vimeo.com/745927

As Canada Court Watch announces in their campaign to expose this outrage they are "Exposing the women's shelter industry one video at a time!" Other similar videos exposing the hypocrisy of the shelter industry and criminal waste of taxpayer dollars can be can be found here: http://www.canadacourtwatch.com/Video/VideoFilesIndex.html

 

 

VIOLENCE CONJUGALE... LES HOMMES TOUJOURS COUPABLES!

 

Dans l'édition du 16 mars dernier, le Courrrier Laval a publié un article en page A 23 qui avait pour titre "LA VIOLENCE CONJUGALE OU CHICANE DE COUPLE?".   La source de ce texte provient de Fannie Roy, agente de promotion et de prévention des Maisons d'hébergement de Laval. Ce texte présente deux défauts majeurs. D'abord, les chiffres avancés par madame Fannie Roy concernant la violence faite aux femmes ne font référence à aucune recherche impartiale crédible. En second lieu, le texte laisse subtilement entendre que seules les femmes seraient victimes de violence conjugale.

 

J'invite madame Fannie Roy à révéler aux lecteurs du Courrier Laval dans une prochaine chronique quelles sont ses sources d'information qui confirmeraient ses chiffres concernant la violence conjugale.

 

Quant à nous, nous préférons nous en remettre, entre autres, aux recherches du très sérieux Institut de la statistique du Québec qui, en 2007, confirmait que la violence conjugale affecte tout autant les hommes que les femmes et leurs enfants.

 

Il est dommage que certains organismes féministes grassement subventionnés puissent ainsi facilement colporter dans les médias des chiffres farfelus, démagogiques, dénués de tout fondement scientifique, pour faire croire à la population qu'il y a fléau de violence conjugale au Québec... avec, en prime, les hommes toujours coupables! 

Jean-Pierre Gagnon

directeur de recherche

L'APRÈS-RUPTURE

ATELIERS LIENS PÈRES-ENFANTS   

 

 

CCTV in Classrooms. Schools turning Orwellian

 

CCTV in class spies on teachers, says union

 

La culotte de fibre de verre des femmes

 

Le Barreau du Québec rend hommage à huit femmes activement engagées dans des organismes voués aux femmes et aux familles

 

Pas de fête des pères
Pas de jour de l'homme
Ils n'ont même pas mis mon anniversaire

Calendrier des événements

 

 

Une promenade sur une histoire inventée

Société des hommes contre la violence faite aux femmes

 

Its a Strange World we live in: Heather Mills v. Ashley Dupre 

Grant Brown PhD

19th March 2008 

It is a strange world we live in where a man can be ordered to pay a woman $50 million after a mere 4-year marriage, and the man is seen as the winner of the legal battle.  

If you work it out, Heather Mills "earned" $1,400 per hour for every hour of her marriage to Paul McCartney.  That tops what Ashley Dupre was paid by Elliot Spitzer on an hourly basis. According to the summary of the judgment that was released, Mills was seeking $7,000 per hour ($250 million) -- i.e. the amount earned by 7-diamond-rated escorts at New York's Emeror's Club. She has a high opinion of herself, evidently.  

Details that have come out about the judgment, and Mills' reaction to it, don't paint a flattering picture of the ungrateful ex-wife. She is reported to have dumped a glass of water over McCartney's lawyer's head in the courtroom -- histrionic behaviour that would never be tolerated by a man in a divorce court. After delivering an 11-minute diatribe against the process and the judgment on the courthouse steps, Mills said she would not appeal the ruling and would oppose the release of any more details to the public. McCartney's only comment was, "All will be revealed." One surmises that the reasons for judgment were not particularly kind to Mills. 

As usual, the aggreived ex-wife's first instinct is to pit the child against the father. Mills complained bitterly after court that she would only get $70,000 per year for little Beatice in child support. "Beatrice will have to settle for traveling in coach while her dad goes first class," she said. As if. No wonder the judge found her position on almost every issue to be unreasonable.  

Still, if Mills were Canadian, she would have a point. By our standards, $70,000 per year in child support is a pittance for someone of McCartney's wealth and income. You would only have to be making about $700,000 per year in Canada to be on the hook for $70,000 in child support for one child. With an income in the order of $40 million per year, McCartney would be paying upwards of $340,000 per month -- per month! -- in child support according to the Federal Child Support Guidelines.  

No wonder Erin Pizzey has described Canada as "the scariest country on the planet" for its treatment of men.

 

Hôpital

 

Sabotage et répression

Le plan St-Pierre

 

Press Release: 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IS TWICE AS BIG A PROBLEM AS YOU THINK 

March 19, 2008

 VOLUNTEER GROUP TO TELL PUBLIC DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IS TWICE AS BIG A PROBLEM AS YOU THINK

 Next time you have “breakfast with the guys,”   Be sure someone you know isn’t suffering in silence                  

Calgary, Alberta: The Men’s Educational Support Association (MESA) will be conducting a two hours awareness campaign about the facts of research on domestic violence.

Volunteers will be distributing brochures telling “the other story” about domestic violence at the Telus Convention Centre, Calgary on Thursday March 20, 2008, from 7:00am – 9:00am where the Premier of Alberta the Honorable Ed Stelmach and the Calgary chief of Police Rick Hanson will be present. 

While women are much more vulnerable to assaults, which justifies giving appreciably greater attention to female victims, the common black-and-white attention has the results that abusive women are not being deterred or treated, abused men are not receiving help, and even children abused by their mothers are often not helped. It has the result that ineffective and even counterproductive remedies are being applied. Beyond this, the stereotype that only men want to hurt their partners results in massive numbers of false allegations being acted on unjustly and precipitously by police and other authorities, resulting in huge amounts of injustice to men, with serious collateral harm to children and to other women (sisters, mothers etc.) in their lives .

“The public is entitled to be apprised about all the truth of domestic violence.  The reason it has not been told is the influence of sexist ideologues of both genders causing the suffering of men, women and children by spreading false and misleading interpretations and imposing flawed solutions that are effectively agitating the cycle of violence and depriving children of a meaningful relationship with their fathers,” says Gus Sleiman president of the Men’s Educational Support Association.   

So many people who are involved in dealing with family violence are influenced heavily by gender-biased ideology rather than by the facts of research. Research has shown for many years that about equal numbers of women and men assault and abuse their partners and children, and do so from similar motives and causes. Yet many of these people speak and act as if such behavior were solely or far more common among men, and some even claim it is done for the sole reason of exercising "patriarchal power".

“The perception that Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is a one-way street of aggression by men against women is generated in large part from non-representative and biased samples, such as police reports and criminal cases reported in the news media. Overwhelmingly, academic surveys of randomly selected members of the general population find that women and men are equally likely to participate in IPV, and women are at least as adept as men at inflicting emotional and psychological abuse-often said to be more debilitating than physical violence.” says Dr. Grant A. Brown DPhil (Oxon), LL.B. 

For further information contact:  

 Gus Sleiman or Dr. Grant Brown

(403) 228- 6366 or (403) 710-7218

 

MEN’S EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT ASSOCIATION (MESA)

P.O. Box 4691 Station “C”, Calgary, Alberta, T2T 5P1
www.mesacanada.com

 

 

Bande d'arriérés
Des automobiles aujourd'hui et demain des autobus

L’Arabie saoudite s’apprête à lever l’interdiction de conduire pour les femmes, dans un effort de contrôler la vague montante d’un mouvement de type suffragettes dans l’État profondément conservateur.

Les conditions imposées par le conseil de la Shura :

• La femme doit avoir moins de 30 ans.

• Elle doit avoir l’autorisation d’un homme [père, mari, frère, ou fils].

• Elle doit obtenir un permis de conduire d’une école de conduite pour femmes.

• Celle qui conduit doit être modestement vêtue.

• La femme pourra conduire seule dans les villes ; en dehors des villes, elle doit être accompagnée d’un parent.

• Elle sera autorisée à conduire du samedi au mercredi entre 7:00 AM et 8:00 PM. 

• La femme au volant doit avoir un téléphone cellulaire avec elle, de sorte qu’elle peut appeler à l’aide en cas d’urgence.

• Elle devra payer une certaine somme lorsque sa licence est délivrée, cette somme sera mise de côté pour les réparations automobiles.

Le Conseil Shura a également émis l’ordonnance suivante :

• La mise en place d’un département spécial de transport pour les femmes ; ce service recueillera les honoraires.

• La création d’un centre téléphonique d’urgence.

• La création de centres de transport pour les femmes dans les villes, qui seront sous surveillance religieuse.

Le conseil stipule que la femme qui enfreint ces règles verra son permis révoqué.

Dans le cadre de cette recommandation, le Conseil de la Shura est requis d’imposer un mois de prison avec sursis et une amende à quiconque parle avec une femme au volant d’une autre voiture, et une peine de huit mois de prison avec sursis et une amende à toute personne qui harcèle sexuellement une femme au volant.

 

 

Bandits en uniforme

La police sous surveillance

 

Regroupement des Organismes pour Hommes de l'Île de Montréal

 

L'ère des interminables adolescences..

 

Une réflexion autour du 6 décembre 1989

 

Equality move could hit white men

 

L'avortement criminel

 

Bientôt dans une rue près de chez vous

China: Tibet protesters 'surrender'

 

1988 - Mikhail Gorbachev speaking at UN , The Boston Globe Dec 8 1988 “….He called for a “new world order” founded not on force but on dialogue…….”