S'il n'y avait que des gens qui se conduisent mal.... à quoi est-ce qu'on reconnaîtrait ceux qui se conduisent bien ?

 

 

"I suppose that one of the female revolution's greatest successes has been the freedom it delivered to men.

Once for a man to have a sex-life he had to marry.

Society was very clear on that principle.

Following the recent decades of equality men can have a very fulfilling life without having to make any commitments at all.

There is a further reason to avoid marriage and many respondents have mentioned it - the disaster that divorce visits on men.

Socially men and women may be equal but in law women are more equal than men.

Why should any man accept a losing game when he can continue to play a winning game?

Feminism freed men - it played to men's strengths and we now enjoy all the benefits of no strings sex and all with society's approval. "

http://www.lndavout.blogspot.com/

 

 

The issue we are facing is turning back an tsunami wave of popular public opinion and feminist propaganda that has become accepted as conventional wisdom.  The enabling cast is impressive

1) There is not a university in the country that does not have a well funded, liberal arts faculty positions for women's studies - be it English, History, Economics, Political Science, Education, Law or Medicine .   Each indoctrinates cohorts of young women and emasculated men.  Lesbian women now have a wonderful employment opportunities beyond Physed (which has also expanded to accommodate the explosion in women's sports).   Very few if any such "R&D labs" for men studies sexists.

2) Past political parties have - for political gain - adopted without question or even qualified review many feminist-oriented policies in the  misplaced belief that they are "helping families" by systematically destroying them.   As one thoughtful man explained it "women divorced their husbands and married the state".   (although sometimes they helpfully self-immolate i.e. Hedy Fry and Sunera Thobani).

3) A vast army of civil servants in our Provincial and Federal government have built their careers on perpetuating bureaucracies that promote Misandrist policy and have symbiotic relationships with massively funding "pro-feminist"  propaganda activity.

4) Law enforcement agencies are similarly infected and compromised - effectively ignoring mens pleas for help while vigorously applying draconian laws in support of women - on the mere hint of hearsay or worse.

5) A single day spent in any family court across the country would quickly disabuse someone of the notion that our justice system is intent on "the best interests of the child" and is impartial in applying the law.  Certainly divorce lawyers would not complain.

Anecdotal incidents are not an effective argument because there is always the suspicion they are the "exception" .

Personally I find it far more convincing to point-out well researched FACTS - like those in the US (and Canadian Studies) which state that the incidence (occurrence) of Domestic "Physical" Violence is under 12-15% of couples per year - split almost equally between Men against Women and Women against Men.  These are not well known or even believed since Feminist's in Canada and the US have succeeded in promoting their own, wildly exaggerated "facts" and casting doubts about many competing studies credibility.

In fact over Xmas I read a review about a soon to be released Canadian book that extolling the heinous and violent deaths of Women by domestic partners (assumed to be Men although by the numbers quoted I suspect it includes same sex relationships).  No mention of violence of Women against Men.  Why? Because it is popular Misandrist opinion that "men  probably deserve it"  (echo of decades ago stereotype that "women asked for it")

In Frank Simons book I felt the the most telling stat he quoted was that approximately 75% of over 700,000 enforcement orders in Ontario
are in arrears!   Can anyone really believe there are that many "deadbeats".  And if there are, would it not seem to imply a
dysfunction somewhere?   If all these men marched down to jail and demanded entry rather than the prison of debt they find themselves,
Ontario's correctional system would fail.   What about relating the well known stats about the increased behaviour risks of children who lack dads and the attendant future cost to our society?  Why do incidents that involve "girl violence" - young girls who somehow incite their boyfriends to plan and kill their parents or randomly, their babies or other girls get a free pass from the media?

All of these issues are shibboleths of feminist propaganda and to question them is political suicide.

Anonymous Edmonton

 

 

Separation Grief: Quantifying The Problem 

http://www.dadsindistress.asn.au/information.html#information1
 

The risks.

A man getting married in Australia today and having children faces the following risks:
33% risk that his marriage will end before his children are reared.
20% risk that his marriage will end against his will.
30% risk that his children will not be living with him until they are reared.
22% risk that he will be separated from his children against his wishes.
10% risk that he will have no contact with his children by the time they are adults.

Compare these figures with other health problems.

A man's lifetime risk of losing contact with his children is twice that of contracting lung cancer. Young separated men are 10 times more likely to die by suicide than through road accidents. The suicide rate amongst separated men is more than double the rate of contracting AIDS for all men and 35 times higher than the risk of contracting AIDS through heterosexual contact.

The numbers.

In Australia each day
77 fathers separate from their child's mother.
71 of these 77 fathers will not be living with their children five years later.
52 of these 77 fathers are denied the amount of contact with their children that they desire.

On average, at least one separated man suicides every day.

In Australia today.

There are 558,000 non-custodial fathers who are denied as much contact with their children as they would like. Unemployment rate amongst separated fathers is roughly triple the national average. About 1,000,000 children do not live with both parents. Both parents care for only 2.6% of these children. 300,000 children see their father less than once a year...
This poll was written in 1996. - P. Vogal Editor of Certified Male.

Latest Suicide Statistics published show that In 2004 sadly 1661 MALES and 437 Females committed suicide in this country.
A Ratio of 4 to 1 (Latest ABS Stats) - Australian Bureau of Statistics-JS

Executive Summary

Every day in Australia five males take their own lives.   The Bureau of Transport Economics places a cost to Australian society of $1.5M for all premature deaths.
Putting aside the emotional issues of such a tragic loss of five lives, Australian society loses $7.5M daily.
Every ten minutes a marriage is dissolved in the Family Law Courts. For every female suicide there are four male suicides.

The Bare Facts Imagine this.

WHILE YOU ARE READING THIS DOCUMENT, A MAN SOMEWHERE IN AUSTRALIA IS TRYING TO HANG HIMSELF FROM THE BEAM IN HIS SHED, ANOTHER IS SWALLOWING A HANDFUL OF PILLS, ANOTHER IS CONNECTING A HOSE FROM HIS EXHAUST PIPE TO THE WINDOW OF HIS CAR AND YET ANOTHER IS CRUISING THE HIGHWAY AND ABOUT TO TURN HIS CAR INTO THE PATH OF AN ONCOMING SEMI TRAILER. 

 

 

Ferguson Speaks From The Heart

 

(***)cratie

Les présidentiables démocrates à la conquête des fragilisés de la crise

 

En bref - Srougi en probation

 

Andy Srougi évite la prison

Officials weigh Del Vecchio's future as Family Court judge

 

Un amendement qui divise

 

Des avocats réclament une enquête sur une affaire de corruption policière

 

Dads DO matter: Why children brought up by BOTH parents are happier and more successful

 

All For Women

 

After divorce, what to do with the ring?

 

The Clintons will do anything—anything—to win the nomination for Hillary, the popular vote be blasted.

The filing of lawsuits, the dangling before the noses of super delegates of various irresistible blandishments—whatever it takes, the Clintons will do.

Without compunction.

Even with a certain glee.

Regardless of the popular vote going into the convention, therefore, Hillary Clinton, and not Barack Obama, will emerge with the nomination.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MWE0Nzc1MDdhOTE2NjMwZWY1Yzc3OTk1OTkxZGRkNDg=

 

You're All Witnesses 

 

Every month is White Bitch Month

Maureen Dowd complains about the unbearable hardship of being a wealthy white woman:

The joke goes: “Obama is just creaming Hillary. You know, all these primaries, you know. And Hillary says it’s not fair, because they’re being held in February, and February is Black History Month. And unfortunately for Hillary, there’s no White Bitch Month.”...

Those close to Hillary say she’s feeling blue. It’s an unbearable twist of fate to spend all those years in the shadow of one Secretariat, only to have another gallop past while you’re plodding toward the finish line. I know that the attacks against powerful women can be harsh and personal and unfair, enough to make anyone cry.

 

A=1, A!=B, therefore B=1

 

MRA’s vs Feminists Stats

 

TrafficEstimate.com (Estimated Number of Visits in the last 30 days):

——Feminists———————————————-MRA’s—————

1. feministing.com————133,600—-1. menarebetterthanwomen.com–139,500

2. pandagon.blogsome.com——-85,800—2. mensnewsdaily.com———–76,400

3. now.org————————-65,300—3. savethemales.ca—————–49,400

4. feministe.us—————–61,700—4. russianwomen.wordpress.com–45,000

5. shakespearssister.blogspot.com—89,458,000*–5. glennsacks.com–39,400

6. amptoons.com——————–55,200—6. nomarriage.com————-35,000

7. feminist.com———————44,100—7. americanwomensuck.com—–24,800

8. feminist.org———————-41,200—8. angryharry.com—————-20,500

9. msmagazine.com—————–38,500—9. the-niceguy.com—————17,700

10.trishwilson.typepad.com—26,700—10. antimisandry.com————-N/A

 

Bill Maher is so funny on this one you have to take your hat

 

Le juge Alain maintenu dans ses fonctions

 

 

Affaire Dumas

 

Interview: Tear down the walls

 

1993 - April 21: General Colin Powell receives the United Nations Association-USA’s Global Leadership Award, and he remarks: “The United Nations will spearhead our efforts to manage the new conflicts (that afflict our world)….Yes the principles of the United Nations Charter are worth our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.”