|
|
Content d'être un gars
|
|
Vendredi, le 1 février 2008
|
|
La Foi n'est pas une faiblesse tant qu'on place au-dessus d'elle son labeur quotidien !
On veut le rendre à ses persécuteurs
Voici un bel exemple de justice à la mode Canadienne.
«Si la police a fabriqué la preuve une première fois, il n'y a pas de raison pour qu'elle ne le fasse pas une seconde fois», écrivait le commissaire au dossier.
Mais pendant ce temps, le ministère de la Justice recevait la demande d'extradition et décidait d'y accéder sans plus de questions.La GRC a donc été envoyée pour procéder à l'arrestation de M. Gavrila à son domicile, vers 6 h mercredi.
Il est maintenant incarcéré à la prison de Rivière-des-Prairies, en attendant que la Cour supérieure statue sur son cas. Il pourrait bientôt être remis aux policiers roumains, ceux-là mêmes qui l'auraient persécuté au point d'en faire un réfugié.
Antiféminisme
Antifeminism
As some of you might know I have met Jeffrey Asher and we have become friends over the last several years. He is a firm supporter of men and Fathers and Children's rights. He lives in retirement in Ottawa and is still active in terms of men's issues, In his early family life He had his own Family Law horror to face on top of his being 'hounded' and belittled by the Dawson College feminist 'pack'. He won his battle in family court. Jeffrey was the last person to teach Men's Studies in any Canadian Colleage or University. There has never been another one. That was nearly 10 years ago now. Jeffrey is a mild and gentle man who did his level best for gender equality studies. he 'went to the wall' for it and never betrayed or compromised his moral stance on equality . His reward was to be humiliated and maligned. This then is Jeffrey's story of how he was forced to stop teaching on Men's issues and their lives and had his career cut short by early retirement at the same time. I can assure you that hearing this from him personally the story becomes even more outrageous in terms of his experience. But let his article below speak for itself.JSLynched by the Sisterhood
By Jeffrey Asher
October 6, 2001
In Autumn 1994, I offered students at Dawson College in Montreal the only course in Canada on Men's Lives. One young woman asked me, "Is this another man-hating course?" I assured her that we would examine men's and women's lives objectively and treat them with equal respect. She smiled and chirped, "I'm in." Father taught me to respect ladies and that human rights were indivisible. In the 1970s, I lectured on sexual equality of opportunity and equality before the law. Like most men, my naïveté about feminist politics was sustained by raging hormones. By 1980, the woman's movement was increasingly co-opted by the lunatic fringe. Germaine Greer pontificated, "Women have very little idea of how much men hate them ... men do not themselves know the depth of their hatred." Marilyn French announced, "All men are rapists, and that's all they are ... all men are the enemy." Further incitements to anti-male hatred and violence exuded from Dworkin, McKinnon and their cohort of vicious bigots. They remain required reading in feminist courses, which exclude male faculty or authors, brainwash young women and ostracize young men. This paranoia is unchallenged by human rights commissions, and financed by governments. Sunera Thobani's recent "hate speech" is further protected by her UBC women's studies professorship.Her academic critics pay for their dissent with their careers. I proposed "Men's Lives", because the three largest departments (Humanities, English and the Social Sciences) offered over 83 courses with feminist titles and content, but nothing objective about men. The Sisterhood attempted to neuter the contents and then stalled registration for "Men's Lives". I threatened to appeal to the Ministry of Education and the media. The few colleagues who still dared to speak to me (off campus) warned me that my career was in peril. I responded with righteous indignation about equality, fairness and academic freedom. Such naïveté.Two-thirds of "Men's Lives" students were women, and like the men, typically open-minded, morally brave, and delightfully quick-witted. They welcomed my course as deliverance from years of classroom male-bashing. In feminist courses, young men were condemned before their classmates as stupid, patriarchal exploiters, batterers and rapists. Those young men loved women.From the course outline: "We will examine men's values and experiences, and the cultural meanings for men of courage, duty, fidelity, success, family protection, career, and sexuality. The intellectual, political, scientific and cultural achievements of men will be surveyed throughout history. Reasoned and compassionate analysis will be used to search for reconciliation away from sexual confrontation, so that men, women and families may live in harmony." Four universities regularly welcomed me as a guest lecturer. The Matriarchy went apoplectic.Students warned me about agents provocateurs incited by teachers to disrupt my classes. One accused me of being paid by Playboy magazine (I wish) and my answering machine recorded anonymous accusations of sexual abuse and death threats. One night the Chair of Women's Studies vandalized my bulletin board, in front of a surveillance camera! On the front page of the Montreal Gazette, she and my department chair defended her bullying. I requested management to terminate her supervision over my courses. A year later, she ordered that my course outline exclude the term "anti-male hysteria." Management suspended me from teaching until I removed the politically-incorrect insight. I appealed and lost.A "Men's Lives" assignment on sex bias in the media required students to search the periodical indexes for article titles with the word "men" and "women." They were astounded to discover that the ratio of female to male articles is 10:1, and often 20:1. Students scoured StatsCan data to rebut hysteria over 'relationship,' 'domestic' and sexual assault propaganda. From my published research, they learned that men comprise 68% of homicide victims, 80% of suicides, 92% of AIDS deaths, 97% of deaths on the job, double the female rate of heart diseases and die six years prematurely. They learned about sex differences in the brain, hormones, abilities, perception and behaviour. My students delighted in the power of statistical research.The Sisterhood denounced scientific methodology and slandered my reputation. Every semester, management incited the worst of students to complain they "felt uncomfortable" and failed my excessively high standards. They even passed a confessed cheater. Truthfully, I was not demanding enough. Students failed who should never have graduated from high school. To management complaints of excessive dropouts, I requested their retention requirements. They indignantly denied quotas, and reprimanded me yet again. According to union grievance officers and lawyers, never before had a teacher been so relentlessly persecuted.Feminist courses impel polarization and 'dumbing down' of the curriculum, to maintain their enrolment. Evidence is plentiful in their course outlines, typically ungrammatical, illogical, filled with jargon and often incoherent. Since the mid-1990s, women students and competent professors increasingly abandoned the Sisterhood for the search for useful knowledge and successful careers.In May of 2000, the Chair of Women Studies, in collaboration with management convened a committee which announced "a significant number of students" in my classes felt "belittled and marginalized if they voiced their opinions or try to substantiate any interpretation of data that may be different."(sic) They again refused to show me the complaints. They cancelled "Men's Lives" and ordered me to prepare (?)within 12 days (?) three new courses on "critical thinking," technology and business ethics, for which they knew I had no training. I protested this injustice and demanded that "Men's Lives" be reinstated. They threatened to fire me.Their timing was shrewd. My students were dispersed and unavailable for protest. Of all colleagues who postured in their classes on freedom of speech, only the president of the union rallied to my defense (thanks, Peter). I refused to capitulate and retired early.In six years of evaluations, students praised "Men's Lives" as among the best courses in the college. Over 85% of students reported that I treated them fairly, with content and teaching that was "superior"and "outstanding". 100% agreed I treated them with "courtesy and respect." For 30 years of evaluations I ranked as one of the most popular, fair, and interesting teachers. I rated highest in "enthusiasm, approachability, tolerance, responsibility, availability, treating students with courtesy and respect and in a fair and non-discriminatory manner", and "motivating students to do their best." How I miss my students' intellectual energy and curiosity. Teaching was my life.The termination of "Men's Lives" eliminated the only rational opposition to political correctness and feminist domination at Dawson College. Half of the human race remains unexamined, except for condemnation. In 2000, Canadian universities listed two courses on men, neither taught that year, and more than 1617 feminist courses, offered in programs from undergraduate to Ph.D. degrees. Throughout higher education, The Matriarchy rules.Radical feminists continue to win their government-subsidized war against men, heterosexuality, the family, religion, merit, objectivity, justice and reality. Long after the defeat of totalitarianism, radical feminism indoctrinates students to discriminate by sex and race and enforces censorship and repression on what is acceptable to think and feel.Citizens must demand reconstruction of the foundations of objective education and liberty. Freedom of speech is essential to maintain the ability to search for the truth. Students' minds must be trained to challenge dogmas if democracy is to survive. The time is long overdue for universities and colleges to eradicate feminist intolerance and return to reason and objectivity. Dedicated teachers are eager to reconstruct an educated and tolerant society.Give us the call.
Heroes of the Feminist Movement!
Lysistrata
LYSISTRATA (LA GRÈVE DU SEXE)
2008 January 15
The Body Shop Canada
55 York Street, Suite 1200
Toronto, ON
M5J 1R7
Re: Misrepresentation within "Stop Violence In The Home" Campaign
Dear Sir/Madam,
While visiting relatives over Christmas I went into The Body Shop in Saskatoon, SK to look for gift ideas. In the store, I noticed your "Stop Violence in the Home" campaign brochures and, after reading through the information, had to send you my thoughts.
My concern with this brochure is that it begins by stating how many women suffer physical and mental abuse from domestic violence but fails to even mention how many men similarly endure abuse from their partners in domestic violence situations. The remainder of the brochure is then gender-neutral in its wording, yet obviously speaking to women by its colorful and floral design. The message that one gets from reading this brochure, therefore, is that domestic violence is one-sided; with women being abused (by men) in large numbers as a result of domestic violence.
I agree that children are greatly affected by domestic violence and that their well-being must be of paramount concern in these situations. However, if society is to accurately address this problem, should we not start with as accurate a picture as possible before developing a program? Let me explain.
Based on a 2005 report by Statistics Canada, the incident rate for domestic violence in this country was seven percent for women and six percent for men. In terms of population, this translates to approximately 653000 women and 546000 men encountering some form of violence at the hands of their current or former partners each year. The study goes into further detail by adding that physical force was used in 72 percent of incidents where the woman was the assailant and 64 percent of incidents where the man committed the assault. Obviously, the well-being of the children would be important in every one of these 1.2 million incidents, not just the 653000 in which the woman was the recipient of the violence. Wouldn't you agree?
I would like to know how you justify targeting a 54.5 percent subset of all domestic violence cases within Canada as if they are an accurate depiction of the overall situation.
I await your response,
Don Dymond
10823 - 97th Street
Fort St. John, BC
V1J 3S6
Prostate exam fees not sexist, human rights tribunal rules
Woman rapes boy at knifepoint
MIND CONTROL
How to resist three UNESCO strategies for training students to reject truth and conform to a pre-planned group consensus
01/15/08
The R3volution is Dead - Long Live the Revolution!!!Edgar J. Steele
"This thing is bigger than both of us, baby. We knew it all along." - "Bigger Than Both of Us," Beier and Kane (2000)Here - let me be the first to say it: The Ron Paul R3volution is dead.
No, that isn't the end of it. In fact, it is just the beginning. The real beginning. Let me also be the first to say, "Long Live the Revolution!" I have written before as to why it must be so. I haven't given up on Ron Paul, but I admit to having been convinced by him that he cannot become America's President. It took a long time. I don't know how often I've heard him tell reporters or interviewers that his followers "have cured (his) skepticism." I wince each time, because I know he doesn't mean it. Too bad.
Yesterday, Dr. Paul issued a statement that he would not challenge the obvious (my word, not his) vote fraud that took place in New Hampshire (and Iowa, for that matter). "I am convinced that vote fraud played no role in this result," said Dr. Paul. I'd like to think that simply was his diplomacy talking. Problem is, this is no time for diplomacy.
A manipulation of 2 or 3 percentage points, which is all that statistical analysis shows is likely to have occurred, would make little difference to the outcome, putting Dr. Paul ahead of the execrable Rudy Giuliani but still trailing Huckabee, Romney and McCain (there is one web site with analysis suggesting Dr. Paul would finish third). However, demanding that the record be set right would have made all the difference in the world to those of us who knew it was coming. Knew it because we've seen it happen before - in Ohio last time, in Florida the time before that and in too many places to be counted, all places where the Diebold electronic voting machines hold sway.
The outcry began almost immediately, when members of a single family who voted lockstep for Ron Paul found, the next morning, that their entire community had tallied precisely zero votes for him. And theirs is not the only community in New Hampshire saying the same thing. Even so, one can infer manipulation from variations between pre-primary and exit polls and the final vote, of course. As noted, variation from the poll figures took place only in those New Hampshire counties in which Diebold machines were used. Elsewhere, the final (hand-written and hand-tabulated) votes tracked almost perfectly to the pre-primary and exit polls.
You have to wonder: Without all the pre-primary dirty tricks (phony polling, stacked "debate" questions, debate exclusion, debate marginalization, false media, no media, ridicule by other candidates and questioners) and with an honest vote count, might Dr. Paul actually have won New Hampshire outright?
Obama - Less of a Loser Than You Might Think
Even more badly aggrieved (and strangely silent on the issue of vote fraud) was Democrat Barack Obama, whose victory in New Hampshire blatantly was stolen for Hillary Clinton in precisely the same manner as was Dr. Paul's placement stolen. Where the votes were hand written and hand counted, Obama won, consistent with his pre-election and exit polling. Only in the Diebold-counted counties did things turn around - and so dramatically that the final result overall was a bare win by Clinton.
Pre-primary polls showed Obama winning with 38% to Clinton's 30%. Normally super-accurate exit polls were a little different, with Obama at 39% and Clinton up to 35%, which exactly matched the results reported by precincts doing hand counts of hand-written ballots. Diebold precincts turned it all around: 40% for Clinton and 35% for Obama, thereby allowing Clinton to edge Obama 39% to 37% with the overall totals. Just like George Bush pulled it out, time and again, eight years ago and, yet again, four years ago. Now you know why Hillary Clinton has been getting special briefings from the White House and why Bush I and Bill Clinton are such hard and fast pals.
I have explained before why they will not allow Obama to win this thing, even though the CFR has him in hand. Obama's sudden show of broad-based voter support makes it highly possible, if not likely, that he would defeat any of the current Republican front-runners in next year's election. Can't have that, of course. Never will Hillary Clinton defeat even the third-rate "leaders" now vying for the Republican nomination, so it is going to be another Republican schlep sworn in as, perhaps, America's last President.
Needed: A Boston Diebold Party
It could have been so much different.
Challenge the New Hampshire results and prove the vote fraud in little towns where voters can testify in numbers greater than were recorded for Dr. Paul. Show it to be more than a simple "transfer error" on the part of a couple of clerks. Turn us loose to protest it. Sue everybody in sight, especially Diebold. File suit in upcoming states to force paper ballots that can be audited. Demand that the US Supreme Court immediately assume jurisdiction upon proving any irregularity, no matter how small.
Boston Tea Party? Hell, let's have a Boston Diebold Party! A little civil disobedience is just what we need at this time. They can't manipulate machines at the bottom of lakes, rivers and bays, after all.
Do the things I have outlined and we all would be in it for the long haul. What's more, exponentially we would increase our numbers through the outrage thereby generated. We could have swept through the rest of the primaries, gaining strength and momentum with each stop.
Auditing - Just Another Word for Pointless
I have a Master's degree in Accounting. I have done accounting auditing. I took an extra year at Cal Berkeley and very nearly double-majored with a Master's in Information Science (computers), as well. I have worked as a Systems Analyst, designing and fixing complex computer software systems. I understand what is involved with computer auditing. Auditing these Diebold-based elections is pointless.
It doesn't matter if the two minor candidates now demanding recounts get them. How do you audit electrons that are long gone? The machines, well recognized to be sloppily designed and security nightmares, can be checked over. The programming can be checked if you get the source code (which Diebold will not release). The memory cards can be verified. But, there is nothing to audit. Once you change the vote inside the machine, there is no record, either internal or external, of that change. In accounting terms, there is no "audit trail."
A change can be forced by original programming, by external command via modem (yes, the machines are accessible by telephone line), by a flash-memory-based program that physically is in and out of the machine in less than a minute, leaving no trace, and by other means even more arcane. The point is: With Diebold voting machines, there is nothing to recount.
So why do I think it is such a mistake for Dr. Paul not to have demanded a recount? Because the statistical inconsistencies and the testimony by voters whose votes got cast for other candidates would make a difference, open the dialogue in the public eye and provide a basis for legally challenging the machines. Because the US Supreme Court is the ultimate political creature, an order disallowing Diebold machine usage in the face of growing public outrage is not at all out of the question.
Did you know that the Diebold voting machines are made in Israel? Did you know that an Israeli company was in charge of tallying the Iowa caucus results? Did you know that Israel, like the Council on Foreign Relations, has blessed every Presidential candidate except Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich (Kucinich is one of the fellows demanding a recount in New Hampshire)? Make of those facts what you will. I'll save what I make of them for another day.
You Could'a Been a Contender
Here's the message you just delivered, Dr. Paul: If you will sit still for vote fraud in New Hampshire, you will tolerate it elsewhere, too. Besides, your post-New Hampshire primary statement made clear your intent to be satisfied with merely helping to set the agenda for the remainder of the contest. You never thought you had a chance, but we knew you did. You could'a been a contender. No - you could have been President.
If you are content merely with influencing the campaign dialogue from here on out, then you seriously misread those of us out here in the trenches. We didn't come to be satisfied with second place, even. If Ron Paul does not become our President, then we have lost. What's more, we have lost our last chance to work within the system.
The powers that be seem not to have gotten the message (about our working within the system just this one, last time), in light of the obvious vote fraud that took place in both Iowa and New Hampshire. They will learn, too late, what a monumental mistake that really was.
Though correcting the New Hampshire result may not seem to be worth the effort, had we immediately raised holy hell about the vote fraud, filing lawsuits left and right, calling press conferences, demanding recounts (using the money we already gave) and organizing protest rallies, possibly we could have salvaged this campaign.
Now that they know they can get away with it, they are going to keep manipulating votes through the Diebold machines, guaranteeing that we lose. At least, by drawing the line in New Hampshire and anywhere that questionable vote counts emerged, we could have gone down swinging for the bleachers.
No More Money Bombs
There will be no more "money bombs." Had you taken even second place in New Hampshire, Dr. Paul, then all the money you possibly could spend - ever - would have been made available to you. All without asking, just as you have not had to ask before. Had you actually won New Hampshire, as some think you could, if only you had you spent all the money we gave you so far, we now would be discussing how best to keep them from killing you, but that no longer is an issue. I'm glad for that, at least.
I will hear none of this carping about paid election staff members, either, which has been going on for some time. Dr. Paul chose them. Dr. Paul chose to keep them in place. Dr. Paul would be the first to accept full responsibility for their failings.
Make no mistake: We still love you, Dr. Paul - and we always will. You didn't break our heart by failing to give it your all, but now there is another crack in it. That is nothing, compared to what so many others before you have done, however. We'll get over it. We always do.
You really should have committed 100% to your own "R3volution," Dr. Paul, because we believed enough for you, too. Together, we could have moved mountains. Together, we could have changed America.
Long Live the Revolution
But, we still can change America and change her we will. And you still will be the grand old man of the New Revolution, Dr. Paul. You were there at the beginning, after all. The times picked you for us, as they always have picked their own agents of change. But you no longer are setting this beast's agenda. It has taken on a shape and a mind of its own now. It will pick up speed and choose new leaders as it mows down everything in its path. The times make the men, after all is said and done, not the other way around.
Let them disallow Ron Paul a level playing field. Let this play out and let them screw him every which way they can, with vote fraud, phony polling, stacked "debate" questions, debate exclusion, debate marginalization, false media, no media, ridicule by other candidates and questioners, recount trace kickover, etc. That merely will serve to open the eyes of those who have chosen to support him and, thereby, greatly increase our number.
Based upon reports I have received from those attending big-city rallies, rallies that the controlled media does not report, things are moving a bit faster, even, than I long have anticipated. I always thought and said that it will take obvious and widespread economic carnage and pain - plus our government actually shooting us down in the streets - before Americans get up off the couch and demand real change.
Already, though, the demand for real change can be heard bouncing off the canyon walls in New York City and Chicago and wherever a critical mass of these too-young Ron Paul "meet-up" supporters assemble: Neocons out! Change now! Listen carefully. Can you hear it building in the distance? I can!
Itz coming!
New America. An idea whose time has come.
My name is Edgar J. Steele. Thanks for listening. Please visit my web site, ConspiracyPenPal.com, for other messages just like this one.
The "Stolen Feminism" Hoax: Anti-Feminist Attack Based on Error-Filled Anecdotes
Two girls one cup
Le juge Alain maintenu dans ses fonctions
1996 - A Reporter’s Life by Walter Cronkite is published, in which he proclaims: ” if we are to avoid catastrophe, a system of world order–preferably a system of world government –is mandatory. The proud nations someday will ….yield up their precious sovereignty.”